What are the owner’s rights in forensic schedule delay analysis? 

Does the owner have the right to require proof or validation of the Baseline Schedule Original Durations when evaluating a Contractor’s Time Impact Analysis (TIA) to support a request for Extension of Time?  

How should the contractor respond in this situation? 

Who owns the float when the Baseline Schedule durations were inaccurate?  

If you are interested in getting the answer to these questions, join the upcoming free masterclass hosted by Project Control Academy.  

This is another series of free training webcasts that will address some of the very good questions posed in the Project Control Academy’s Online Forums by the participants in the Forensic Schedule Delay Analysis course.  We see these training series as a way to provide more public insight into a number of excellent forensic analysis questions that we find are asked by the knowledgeable participants. 

In this masterclass, the industry thought leader, Chris Carson, will discuss all the ramifications of this issue and help you with a better understanding of this issue from both the Owner and Contractor perspective. You will be equipped with the suggested approaches to dealing with and resolving this topic when it arises.   

Implementing the proposed strategies in this master class should lead to avoiding the problem in most cases and result in quicker, more collaborative resolution when the issue does arise. 

To be more specific, the following topics will be discussed.